![]() She gives the full name of the school her daughter went to. The subject is very precise on the age when her daughter was first called to perform. And she called and made an appointment with the manager of the person. MURPHY: Well, when she was 12-and-a-half she - the - a studio that she was studying at, Fernz Faller (ph) School of the Performing Arts in New Jersey. KING: How did you come to bring her out here? She switches from what it was to how her daughter felt. Self censoring occurs here right after “and it was -” which indicates missing information. Keep in mind that the picture being presented of this tiny, fragile girl may be directly related to the way she died. This is a priority in her mind for some reason. The subject gives details here, but again refers to her daughter’s physical size. And she was little because she always had so much energy and - and it was - she just loved it and had so much fun and did regional theatre growing up. MURPHY: She started, you know, in dance school and musical comedy classes. This is a low stress way for the subject to respond. Here Larry King, an experienced interviewer, picks up on the fact that the subject offered no details to answer his question and referred to herself instead of the topic of conversation, so he prompts her by offering suggestions to answer his questions, which she then agrees with. KING: Was she the kind of kid who danced and sang when she was in kindergarten and… We will see more of this same language throughout the interview. “she came out of me a show person” when discussing her daughter’s career is to use the language of ownership in regards to this “show pwerson”. This is the language of a stage mother with a strong connection to her “show person” daughter. ![]() She then refers to self, when asked about another, and includes herself and the mother-child bond and her child’s birth when asked about her daughter’s career aspirations. With this question the interviewer has asked about the daughter’s desire to be in show business and the mother’s response is to speak about her physical size. And she just came out of me a show person… KING: Did she always want to be in show business? When a subject does not answer a question as asked there is a reason. This subject is using the language of deception with intent. Three negatives in a row, repeated word, this is persuasive language, using an absolute, which we already know is not true. And we already know that Brittany did spend time with her father during her younger years because we have seen the photos. The word never makes it an absolute, which are rarely true. The subject doesn’t answer the question, only offers a vague assertion. Repeated word, sensitivity to the subject. KING: And you raised her as a single mom? You will see this pattern with both subjects of this interview. When you tell the truth from memory you do not have to pause to think, and you don’t interrupt your thoughts unless it is to correct the information given, not to begin another thought. ![]() This interrupts the flow of information, which is an indication of possible deception. This indicates that she is not speaking from memory. The subject is self censoring, which she does throughout the interview. MURPHY: Until she was - Edison, New Jersey… Brittany, she always wanted to be in show business, didn’t she, as a kid? LARRY KING: Let’s go back a little, Sharon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |